Tesla valuation estimates have widened dramatically from a per-share low of $195 to a high of $4,000, after CEO Elon Musk tweeted plans on Aug. 7 to explore taking the electric car company private prior to announcing on Aug. 24 that it would stay public after listening to top financial and legal advisors.
Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) definitively indicated in a website blog that Musk and his board of directors agreed to keep the stock publicly traded, despite short sellers on the prowl to torpedo the company’s valuation. Indeed, Tesla valuation estimates from traditional stock analysts and other experts now diverge substantially and leave investors able to find reasons to sell shamelessly or to buy boldly.
JPMorgan Chase slashed its 12-month Tesla price target on Aug. 20 to $195 from $308, equaling a 36.69 percent cut.
Brian A. Johnson, an automobile company analyst with Barclays, wrote in an Aug. 27 research note that he projects a 35 percent downside to $210 a share from Tesla’s current price, partly due to “cracks” in the credibility of Tesla’s leadership after the Aug. 7 tweet by Musk about taking the company private and his Aug. 24 reversal. Barclays previously expressed doubt about whether Tesla could go private and still retain more than 2,000 non-institutional investors, including 500 non-accredited backers, if Tesla no longer traded publicly.
Tesla Valuation Concerns Raised by Barclays
“One of the key tenets of confidence for Tesla bulls is that the Model 3 will be the iPhone of cars,” Johnson wrote in his Aug. 27 research note. “We have consistently maintained that the bull case around Tesla is more faith-based than fundamental valuation based.”
The first key element is that Tesla will gain a dominant market share position in the auto industry similar to the way the Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:APPL) iPhone became the rage in the mobile phone arena. Tesla aims to turn its Model 3 into the middle-class electric car of choice with a $35,000 price and has produced 400,000 reservations for the vehicle.
The second key element is that Tesla would “disrupt” other industries, including trucking/transport, mobility, energy, generation/storage and even insurance.
However, the Tesla valuation of $210 a share by Barclays in the next 12 months projects the company as a “large niche player” but its true present value is “only $143” a share, Johnson wrote. The focus now shifts to Tesla’s third-quarter financial results when its management has promised the company will be cash flow positive, Johnson wrote.
Tesla’s shares fell $7.41 on Tuesday, Aug. 28, to $311.86, down 2.32 percent. However, the stock is slightly above breakeven so far this year.
Chart Courtesy of stockcharts.com
Tesla Valuation Receives Unbridled Bullishness from ARK Invest
Catherine Wood, chief executive officer of ARK Invest, wrote an open letter to Musk and his board of directors on Aug. 22 that pleaded to keep the company public and fulfill its potential valuation within five years of $700 to $4,000 a share. If the company was privatized at the $420 a share price that Musk proposed, Tesla would be undervalued and deprive many investors of an opportunity to participate in its future success, she wrote.
“Our $4,000 per share price target assumes that Tesla evolves from a hardware manufacturer with 198 percent gross margins to a company generating most of its profits from Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS), a business that we believe will enjoy 80 percent gross margins,” Wood wrote in her letter. “In the $4,000 scenario, our assumptions are conservative: we incorporate profits only from cars and certain autonomous taxi networks, not from trucks, drones, utility scale energy storage or the MaaS opportunity in China.”
Wood, who also is the head of a technology-focused mutual fund company, ARK Investment Management LLC (ARK), said her Tesla valuation accounts for roughly $20 billion in dilution that might be necessary to “penetrate and scale” the latter four markets of trucks, drones, utility scale energy storage or the MaaS opportunity in China. In an ARK white paper that I obtained, the investment firm raised the possibility that the traditional automotive industry may be “subsumed” by Mobility-as-a-Service platforms that could become one of the most valuable investment opportunities in public equity markets.
Tesla Valuation Fueled by Proliferation of Autonomous Taxi Services
The ARK white paper predicted:
-Autonomous taxi services would become commercially available in 2019 and should be the dominant form of door-to-door mobility by the late 2020s.
-Self-driving taxis will cost consumers $0.35 cents per mile, or roughly half of the all-in cost car owners now pay to drive, thanks to much higher utilization rates. These “compelling economics” should drive widespread adoption of autonomous taxi networks.
-Traffic will rise almost three-fold by 2030, as autonomous taxis will allow the non-driving population, including the blind, elderly and young teens, affordable and convenient transportation options.
–Autonomous cars should cause a shift away from personally owned vehicles, depressing global auto sales volumes in the coming decades. ARK’s research shows that auto sales will fall by nearly half in developed markets. In the developing world, auto volumes likely will increase over the long term, but at a rate much slower than expected today.
“Clearly, most asset managers in the public markets do not agree with us, which is why I am writing to you now,” Wood wrote.
Tesla Valuation of $4,000 a Share Draws Unabashed Skeptic
One of those skeptics is Hilary Kramer, a Wall Street investment professional who recently recommended the sale of Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F) in her Turbo Trader and Inner Circle advisory services. Kramer told me unequivocally that Tesla would not reach $4,000 a share in five years.
“It is outlandish to say that Tesla can be worth $4,000 a share because that would imply an $680 billion market capitalization,” Kramer told me. “That is simply not happening.”
Dr. Mark Skousen’s Forecasts & Strategies investment advisory service produced a 64.1 percent return in then-struggling Ford between December 2009 and January 2011 but he is not investing directly in Tesla as the company seeks to become profitable. However, Skousen is recommending ARK Innovation (NYSE:ARKK), which has zoomed more than 32 percent since he advised his Forecasts & Strategies subscribers to buy it on December 18, 2017. Tesla is the fund’s top holding with an 8.75 percent share at the close of trading on Aug. 28.
Skousen described ARKK as “one of the most successful ETFs in history.” It already has more than $6.6 billion assets under management and three of Arkk’s funds are among the ETF leaders ranked by Investor’s Business Daily. The actively managed ETF focuses on five current innovations: automation, energy storage, DNA sequencing, next-generation internet and blockchain technology.
Ironically, Musk faced fierce criticism for tweeting his interest in taking Tesla private but he showed open-mindedness by opting against it after input from Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) and buyout firm Silver Lake. Legal advice came from prominent firms Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Munger, Tolles & Olson.
The use of Golden Sachs as a financial advisor led its auto analyst David Tamberrino, who previously had given Tesla a $210 price target, to announce on Aug. 15 that the firm would move the stock to “not rated.” As a financial advisor, Goldman Sachs gained access to information that is “fundamental” to a reasonable analysis of Tesla’s rating and 12-month price target, according to Goldman’s Americas Investment Review Committee.
Tesla Short Selling Involves More than 25 Percent of the Company’s Float
Tesla short selling interest is valued at $10.46 billion, totaling 32.77 million shares shorted, or 25.70 percent of the overall 170.59 million shares outstanding through Aug. 27, according to S3 Partners, a financial technology company. Short sellers seek to profit when a company’s share price falls, while they lose money when the share price climbs.
Chart Courtesy of S3 Partners
Short sellers on paper collectively are down $839.86 million, or a fall of 7.82 percent, so far this year through Aug. 27, but are up $863.02 million, or 7.74%, on a mark-to-market basis since Musk’s tweet about potentially taking the company private on Aug. 7, S3 Partners found.
In the third quarter, Tesla short sellers have a mark-to-market gain through Aug. 27 of $859.86 million, or 7.75 percent. However, Tesla short sellers have a mark-to-market loss of $5.373.67 million, or 61.58 percent, since the start of 2016, according to data from S3 Partners.
The highest Tesla valuation depends on whether investors are willing to give its prospects for Mobility-as-a-Service the same lofty levels as ARK Invest. With the end of the third quarter coming on Sept. 30, Tesla will have its next chance as a public company to show its progress in manufacturing its Model 3 cars in sufficient numbers and selling them well enough to achieve Musk’s goal of becoming cash flow positive.
Paul Dykewicz, www.pauldykewicz.com, is an accomplished, award-winning journalist who has written for Dow Jones, the Wall Street Journal, Investor’s Business Daily, USA Today, the Journal of Commerce, Seeking Alpha, GuruFocus and other publications and websites. Paul is the editor of StockInvestor.com and DividendInvestor.com, a writer for both websites and a columnist. He further is the editorial director of Eagle Financial Publications in Washington, D.C., where he edits monthly investment newsletters, time-sensitive trading alerts, free e-letters and other investment reports. Paul previously served as business editor of Baltimore’s Daily Record newspaper. Paul also is the author of an inspirational book, “Holy Smokes! Golden Guidance from Notre Dame’s Championship Chaplain,” with a foreword by former national championship-winning football coach Lou Holtz.